Arts Writing
2015 reviews and information



ORIGINAL SITE
INFORMATION
CONCEPT
In 2015, I completed a six-month internship with Black Canvas Acoustic Design and Art Gallery in Brisbane. During this time, I supported the gallery’s communications and audience engagement strategy by attending and reviewing exhibitions, developing written and visual content, and assisting with the curation of the gallery’s online presence.
My role involved translating in-person experiences into digital narratives that reflected the gallery’s creative identity and fostered stronger connections with its community.
LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION

Men In Uniform | Sally Edwards
NOVEMBER 19, 2015

One of the first things you’ll ever notice about the Brisbane art scene after you’ve been to a couple of shows, is just how incredibly well dressed everyone is. I suppose it’s quite natural that when you get a group of people together who love visual things, how they present themselves becomes a natural part of the equation.
So when it was heard that there was going to be a show at A-CH Gallery in West End (right next to The End) that was going to be combining fashion and art, there was a lot of interest and quite a large crowd.
Sally Edwards is currently working on her Fine Arts Honours majoring in fashion at The Queensland University of Technology, and the show Men In Uniform is the practical endpoint of her project. Structured like your typical runway show, this collection of menswear went so far beyond that. What brought it into the art world was its criticism of damaging male gender roles, and its reconstruction into a more feminine, queer and subversive story.

The collection of about six pieces had all the classic shapes and lines you would imagine a military uniform to have. There was the classic military jacket, the high waist military trousers and broad pleated chest pockets. The lines were straight up and down, the cuts were sharp and rigid and had the sense of solid functionality in their structure.
This is the point where the similarity to classic military uniforms end. The most obvious thing first of all was that there was not one hint of green. The colour palette ranged from the dusky orange of the waisted jacket, burgundy reds of the turtleneck and trousers and the bright bubblegum pink of the coat. It was bright, unashamed and very camp.

There were also slight changes in how the garments were structured compared to the traditional expectations. One particular piece took the elements of what would seem like the button up shirt and trousers, with the broad pleated pockets, shoulder passant (that took a lot of googling) and bright gold buttons. Edwards flipped this on its head by turning the whole outfit into a playsuit, making it sleeveless, cutting it off into shorts and creating a waistline with a belt. In its rosy pink, the rigidness and formality classically associated with the uniform is undermined. The authority is still there in the pleats and lines of the materials however. It’s an interesting clash of what would typically be associated a feminine style of dressing, especially with the creating of a slightly more womanly silhouette with the waisted belt and the authority radiating from the traditional symbols of masculine, military clothing. I personally found looking at this playsuit, it seems to have much more functionality and flexibility than a typical military uniform, especially with the addition of the shorts. Not to mention it made that models butt look fantastic. A perfect peach.

Edwards also used material to circumvent traditional clothing codes. The russian-esque floor length coat in its cut and style is simplistic. Once again the straight up and down line, clean and solid shoulders and broad collar. If in any other material it would just be a fantastic coat for a man desperately gendernormative if you lived somewhere where it actually got cold. However much like the simple changes in structure mentioned before, this jacket was made very flamboyant with the change of material into a bright baby pink latex. Or course it’s idealistic to believe that colours should be not subscribed a certain gender association because of their history. But I believe Edward’s in creating this jacket is allowing for the commonly female associated colour pink, and the homosexual/kinkster associated latex to be invited into and create a relationship with a typically heteronormative cut and design. I like to believe this is a good step forward, sometimes inviting two people into the same room together that have been separated for so long allows for the differences to begin to be reconciled.

Shows like these, and Edwards’ work are so important to recognise as genuine art shows and not just fashion shows. It’s an important step into combining together the often highly commercialised world of fashion with the criticality of the art world and creating an entirely new language to politically comment on how people look at and try to understand each other by deconstructing and decoding the visual cues we are so used to. What Edwards’ has acheived with her show is a practical way to be able to intervene with commonly assumed notions of gender and queer associations, such as the waistline and colours into the often closed off world of straight masculine identity. In the especially closed off world of men’s fashion, where the choice often only appears to be shirt/shorts/tshirt/button-up shirt/jeans, this is a welcome breath of fresh air. Another into mainstreaming gender flexible clothes for men.

f l o a t | Queensland College of Art and Brisbane Powerhouse
NOVEMBER 6, 2015

On Wednesday October 14th I dropped by The Brisbane Powerhouse to see F L O A T. The exhibition was held on the Turbine Platform, and was a group exhibition of 14 Queensland College of Art Students.
After a tumultuous walk making my way through the suburbs of New Farm (not a simple process) and accidentally walking past the show a few times I was finally able to establish myself on a couch with a well needed wine to see what was happening. The exhibition was structured so that there were 14 separate videos playing on the one large screen one after the other, all together the loop took about 45 minutes. So the vibe of the show was really more like a very casual movie showing rather than an image sound projection event. However that did not detract from the quality of the work at all.

I had done a bit of research (I read the Facebook event) and the premise of the show was 14 students had gone on an excursion to North Stradbroke Island and were tasked with making works in response to their stay there. They also were allowed to collaborate with students from the Conservatorium of Music to create sound for their work, which a few of the artists successfully did. It was a shame however that due to the nature of the Brisbane Powerhouse, being big and very echoey, and the large turnout of people there, they were often drowned out, thus I wasn’t able to receive the full effect of the sound aspect.
There were however quite a few promising works that speak to an already well established practice, and lots of potential for the future. I was especially pleased to see that no two works were ever really the same. There was a true sense of variety in each artist’s response to the landscape. The nature and landscape of North Stradbroke Island being the only common recurring theme. Particularly the seascape and horizon, the unique beach scrub and explorations in the water.
A couple of the works went very analytical and isolated single aspects of the landscape, that obviously struck a chord with the artists. Renata Buzlak, who worked with Vanessa Tomlinson to create the soundscape, produced the work Melaleuca Quinquenervia… antiseptic. The title of the work is the scientific name of the paperbark, one of the predominant plants on the island, Buzlak used this tiny aspect of the landscape rather than pointing her camera outwards and filming the whole landscape. Buzlak isolated this small branch, placed it on a photographic emulsion paper, filmed its decay and fusion and regeneration into new funguses and molds. Tomlinson’s soundscape was discordant and erratic, yet elegant and delicate. Matching the pace and speed of the time lapse, the work captured the not often observed cycle of nature, something essential to the landscape of North Stradbroke. The work really brings to life just how alive the bush is in its single element, rather than being objectified in its full context.

This simplification of focus became one of the more successful themes throughout the night. Cale Searston had success with this as well with his digital film Cold of Brown Lake. Searston focused on documenting the process of playing with the sand at the bottom of Brown lake. It was an incredibly relaxing video to watch. Filmed underwater, the colour of the water made everything an incredibly warm red that I was not expecting, with the background fading into an ominous black. Watching the hand pick up the sand and move it around in front of the camera really made you focus on the materiality of the sand interacting in the water. Again, another small isolated moment and action in the broad landscape of North Stradbroke, but powerful enough to really absorb you into the feelings and sensations of what it would be like to be there.
That’s not to say there weren’t more elaborate works that weren’t powerful. Wha Suk (Lucy) Park created Puzzle, a series of collages of human waste and detritus found on the island to create images of natures and plants. However she then constructed the collage into a slow moving video where different aspects of the collage faded in and out at different times, sometimes to just a white space, sometimes to leaves, turning a cigarette butt into a tree for example. A powerful comment on the impact of human waste on the natural landscape. I was actually sitting next to her and her friends on the night and she certainly deserved the little round of applause she got from her friends when her video finished up.

Like Park, there were other works that were able to comment on the politics surrounding the nature of the island. Nicole Paulsen in Island Acquaintance filmed her way driving around the island, the classic Australian beach-and-bushscape. She then projected that footage onto the side of a house with a window in the middle of it and a bush on the side. I loved this video because it immediately struck me as a modern re-interpretation of paintings such as The Car by John Brack. The sense of voyeurism looking over the Australian landscape literally through the window. I believe it makes a strong comment about our objectification of our own natural landscape, and how we as Australians are so isolated from the environment.


I could certainly go on and on about all the videos about the exhibition, say like how in James Hornsby’s work Something’s Wrong it went through as a highly kaleidoscopic and heavily edited dreamscape version of North Stradbroke, but then to finish up with just a shot of a cow in the middle of a field actually made me laugh out loud. But in the end there were 14 videos. However it is obvious from that night this cohort is very talented. All of the videos demonstrated unique sets of view and an ability to think critically of their source materials in different ways. Kudos also goes to the Queensland College of Art for organising this opportunity for the students. A good night with good art and hopefully, I’ll actually get to go to North Stradbroke Island very soon.

The Garden of Shatrick | The Laundry Artspace
OCTOBER 28, 2015

The collaborative duo of Shatrick, made up of Shannon Tonkin and Patrick Zaia, according to their website promises their work is a combination of a few sexy sounding words that culminates in EPIC WALKTHROUGH NARRATIVES. On the 25th of September, I visited ARI The Laundry Artspace to look at their show The Garden of Shatrick.
Initially arriving at the venue, it is your typical ARI kind of house. Unassuming suburban area, obvious share house etc, a precarious walk down and a little game of limbo with their garage. The usual. However arriving outside the house, you immediately notice the constant, rhythmic humming. It was repeated so consistently I genuinely thought it was a recording looped over. It is then that you are greeted with a door covered with bright pink streamers. When you enter the small walk through, there are of course many more pink streamers coming from the roof, mostly obscuring to the vision to the other side. However you can make out that the exit to the hallway is obscured by a large pink plastic sheet with a large slit in the middle.

The realisation that you are now standing in a large cavernous vagina becomes even more obvious as you realise both sides of the wall are also covered in large pink plastic sheets. But i’ve never been one to say no to a good old fashioned rebirthing ceremony. Probably my favourite part of this room however was the projection. On the left side of the walk-through on the pink sheet was a looping projection that took up the entire wall. The sheer size of the projection in such a small space was impressive enough (where on earth did they hide that thing?) but the content of it did make me laugh. Rapidly across the wall a large edited version of their faces flickered rapidly backwards and forwards in more bright barbie pink tones. Heavily stylised in a blurred kind of fashion, the smiling faces were bringing you forth into the world of Shatrick. It’s important to note at this point the rhythmic humming is still happening, and adds to the intimate, very womb-like feel of the room. It was a clever way to really absorb you straight into their intimate little world. Visual gag received, I made my out through the labia into the next room.


Now while this room was the much less vibrantly decorated than the other room, it definitely held the much deeper content. Straight to it, the artists Zaia and Tonkin are standing in the middle of the room on a small, circular black mat with ritualistic candles around the outside and small, almost rat like assemblages at their feet. They were holding each other in an open mouth kiss, with pink sheets of tissue paper over their faces reminiscent of The Lovers by Rene Magritte. They were also completely nude except for small blotches of pepto bismol pink paint splotches all over their bodies, and small flower petals over their nipples. The open mouthed kiss was also the source of the continuous humming.

I later learned they continued humming into each others mouths naked like this for three hours during the exhibition, only taking one or two breaks to go to the toilet. In the beginning there was of course the original shock and novelty factor that comes with incredibly raw and vulnerable works like these. A few people tittered and then moved on outside quickly. But the more time you spent in the room, the more desensitised you became to their presence and the more you able to focus on the other aspects of the room.

In the other corner next to the Shatrick; a small, one person, change room tent had been erected. Shatrick had completely filled the inside with their own murals. It was reminiscent of new age, fertility magic illustrations (the kind of style you would see inside a crystal healing store), but with an acute self-awareness and sense of humour. There were fortresses of penises ejaculating violently near the face of a fireball with a screaming face bearing down on them. A slightly stoned looking cloud with small sperm like structures breaking off of him. But probably the most contextually important part of the mural was the Psoriasis Phaerie, naked and covered in the little bright pink dabs like Zaia and Tonkin. This Goddess figure that obviously ties symbolically into the performance fed into this feeling that Shatrick are inviting us to view their intimate, sexually charged universe of their own creation, with their own religious dogma. The clues lie in things like the Psoriasis, the bright pink colour theme, and the constant throwbacks to surreal imagery in everything from the Magritte reference to the dream like style of the mural tent. These are evidence of a complicated multi-layered world. We won’t fully understand it because it’s an eco system that they created, that they need each other to sustain. Like how they sustained each other for three others in the performance. It’s a beautiful testament to the absorbing nature of collaborative works.

Probably the weakest work in the room was the small, paper mache car-like structure tucked away behind the tent. I feel it didn’t have that sexually charged, totally over the top theatrical elements like the rest of the works, and I didn’t fully understand the relevance to the rest of exhibition. But then again, I feel like the strength of Shatrick’s collaborative relationship lies in complete non-concern in making sense. I know this weird little car fits in somewhere, but it’s not important to the duo that I know where.

I also slightly wish the second room was dramatically filled as the first room. The first walk through was slightly smaller yes, and thus easier to completely cover. But if you’re going to commit to the theme of an EPIC WALKTHROUGH NARRATIVE, you really need to push to make sure that it’s as truly as dramatic and theatrical as you can possibly make it, even if it is cheap and gaudy things as tons and tons of streamers or just a couple of extra projections covering the bare walls. Even some more of the beautiful bouquets of condom flowers lovingly assembled at the bottom of the tent.

Overall however Shatrick as a duo definitely know how to put on a good show. I was confronted, entertained, absorbed and slightly confused, which I imagine a large part of their goal to be. The quirky and intimate elements of the room created a puzzle of a deep and well established collaborative relationship that doesn’t need to make sense to the outside world. I’m excited to see more of their work in the future, to see how much deeper and further their world gets.

Copyright and Copy-oh-so-wrong
A Guide to copyright law for Australian Artists
OCTOBER 21, 2015

Photo credit:opensourceway / Foter/CC BY-SA
So you decided to take the plunge huh?
This is it. You’re an artist. While you’re constantly plagued by self doubt and insecurity something inside you tells you to keep going. Now you’re working on some good stuff. People are starting to pay attention. You’re getting offers and your fan base is growing, everything is peaches and cream. But like any industry you have to be careful, most importantly you should be aware of your legal rights and obligations. One of the most tricky aspects of this can be ensuring that the copyright of your work is protected, and you are well aware of the rights you hold over your work.
Law can be pretty dull to look into. I know, I had to trawl through a couple of dense readings for this. However copyright in visual art or the arts is becoming more and more important especially when the internet comes into play.
Before you can start understanding your rights, it is important to know what copyright is. According to the Arts Law centre of Australia copyright it is a collection of economic and exclusive rights to do “certain things in relation to the object it protects.” (2015).
This means you hold the exclusive right to reproduce, copy, publish, perform, communicate and adapt your work however you like to.
Probably the most key point in Australian law comes from the Copyright Act 1968. In particular Section 32 (1) states that:
(1) Subject to this Act, copyright subsists in an original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work that is unpublished and of which the author:
(a) was a qualified person at the time when the work was made; or
(b) if the making of the work extended over a period—was a qualified person for a substantial part of that period.

Photo credit:Jeff Hester/Foter/CC BY-NC-SA
Essentially what this outlines is the creator of the artistic work (or the author) is the first owner of the copyright. Copyright is automatic upon the creation of the work, don’t think you need to register it somewhere. While there isn’t a general definition of what an author is, it has been interpreted as the person who created the work by putting it into a form that is protected by copyright. Straight forward enough right? You make something original, it’s yours. But law is anything but simple and there are a few key things to keep in mind.
1. You’re an employee somewhere, what you made for them was a part of your employment there. Then really the company owns the copyright. The most obvious example being graphic design work for an organisation.
2. Commissioned works. Now depending on the kind of works, it is possible for the person who commissioned the work to become the copyright holder. There are two specific examples. Photos taken for a private or domestic purpose, like wedding photos or that photoshoot you got with your dog because they just had a really nice haircut. The second is paintings or drawings of a portrait. It’s their image and they’ve commissioned it.
3. Crown Rights, holds that any work made under the Government, the copyright is held by the Government.
Other than that, any commissioned work should be yours. It’s your image, thus your copyright. Even if you sell a painting to a customer, you’re only selling them the physical work, unless it is specifically written in a legal agreement you still hold the copyright of that work. It is important to note however the person or business who commissioned the work still retains the right to use it for its commissioned purpose. So when entering into a commission agreement, be very aware of what they are using it for before you sign the contract.
There is another important catch. You cannot copyright an idea. If you tell your friend that you’re planning on making a giant statue of your dog wearing a neat hat, and never actually materialise it then you don’t own the copyright. If your friend then goes on to makes said sculpture, they are the holders of the copyright, because they actually physically created it. This of course taps into ideas of originality, which is a huge debate by itself. While it is ok to work within the realms of appropriation and get inspiration from other artists, it is important to establish that any part you are taking from a source work is not a substantial part of it. According to the Arts Law Centre of Australia, that is more important than whether it is a substantial part of resulting work you make.

If someone does start to use your work without applying for a licence for your copyright and you haven’t assigned them the copyright, there are of course legal avenues you can head down. From issuing a Letter of Demand, all the way to an injunction to get them to cease creating unauthorised copies of your work and reimbursement for any profits that they made. The Arts Law Centre of Australia has many great resources and support systems you can access if someone does begin to plagiarize your work.
Don’t think because you’re a small artist that you don’t have the same rights and privileges as Damien Hirst and Takashi Murakami. Being aware of your copyright will only help keep your images, and your career, safe.
Resources
Arts Law Centre of Australia on Copyright
http://www.artslaw.com.au/info-sheets/info-sheet/copyright/
Arts Law Centre of Australia Copyright Infringement and Letter of Demand
http://www.artslaw.com.au/info-sheets/info-sheet/copyright-infringement-and-letter-of-demand/
Attorney General’s Website - Intellectual Property and Copyright
http://www.ag.gov.au/RightsAndProtections/IntellectualProperty/Pages/default.aspx
Arts Law Centre of Australia on Appropriation Art
http://www.artslaw.com.au/articles/entry/appropriation-art-an-overview-of-copyright-and-consumer-protection-for-arti/
Artist Profile | Ricky Larry
SEPTEMBER 24, 2015

Ricky Larry is a Brisbane based artist currently studying at the Queensland College of Art. Using installation and sculpture Ricky alters the perception of natural landscape by typically installing artificial forms into it that play with light and reflectiveness. Ambitious and visually absorbing, Ricky recently showed his work at Cut Thumb Ari in his solo exhibition Empty Kingdom.
Like his facebook page here:
https://www.facebook.com/ricky.larryart.9?fref=ts
1. I grew up…
Everywhere, I went to eight different schools and lived in sixteen different houses till the age of 17.
2. I am most comfortable…
When I have nothing to think or stress about, or out in the sun, near the ocean wink emoticon.
3. I like…
Water, either drinking it or being in it.
4. I don’t like…
People who walk slow in shopping centres.
5. My personality is…
Pretty relaxed, easy going, socially awkward.
6. I got into art when…
I first saw a Andy Warhol book at school, which also showed him hanging out with my soon to be favourite painter Jean Michel Basquiat, I was about 12. Before that I was just great at drawing dogs , portraits and flowers.
7. My artistic style is…
Ambitious. I like to create work which pushes me and the audience.
8. The best thing about being an artist is…
Creating work. I love to create work in which I can express thoughts and ideas practically its the most satisfying thing to me.
9. The mediums I use are…
The environment and sculpture, with the ideas I am mindful of the natural environment and inserting an artificial form or object into it. Usually documenting this through photography or an installation.
10. My key influences are…
My observations and awareness influence my work greatly. My ideas are generated by my surroundings. Working in the city and seeing people scooting around or shop windows and modern architecture all keep me thinking about making more works.
11. The artists I admire are…
James Turrell, Anish kapoor, olafur eliasson, Joseph Kosuth, Alex da Corte, Marina Abramovic, Rachel Harrison, Yayoi Kusama, Tracy Moffat, Ian Strange
12. Art is important because…
Because it teaches us culture, analytical skills and embraces originality. I feel like art enriches everyone who invests time in it, as it provokes thought process and enables us to look at different aspects of life from various view points. And helps us realise not to take ourselves to seriously.






TBC and Crowbar | POINT AND SHOOT - An Exploration of Music Photography
SEPTEMBER 23, 2015

So often when you bounce around from gallery to gallery you become used to the normal expectations of the white cube. Somewhat quiet atmosphere, clean and polished. So it’s nice sometimes when an exhibition breaks that kind of mould and does something different to really commit to its theme.

From September 8th - 10th, The Brisbane Collective and Crow Bar teamed up together as an unofficial part of Big Sound to present Point and Shoot - An Exploration of Music Photography.
Having never been to the Crowbar before, but hearing many classic stories from numerous hardcore music fans, it definitely came across as advertised, except maybe a little cleaner than I was expecting. Your classic rock and roll bar with a laid back vibe. Lots of nice wood furnishings, classic album art everywhere and of course a nice big dance floor. TBC really worked with what they had, and didn’t overwhelm the venue. Instead they created unique, scrap wood structures, with lots of fairy lights, which made the installation fit seamlessly into the Crowbar aesthetic.

As a whole, the works included in the exhibition were well curated. Each different set captured a different and unique part of the live music experience that were filled with personality and life. From dreamy, stylised portraits of musicians, passionately violent images from the centre of the mosh pit and of course plenty of raw images of musicians from Taylor Swift to local Brisbane gigs doing their best performances. The artists chosen were really a testament to what can sometimes be the highly underrated world of music photography. It takes a lot in the end to be a successful music photographer. You certainly wouldn’t find me lugging around thousands of dollars worth of equipment into raging mosh pits, battling erratic stage lighting, sweat and some hearing damage for that perfect photo. Yet these artists took on all those challenges and they’ve managed to capture perfect moments of what makes live music so great.

Though each artist was strong in their own right, a couple I was particularly drawn to were Savannah Van Der Niet and Mitch Lowe. Van Der Niet is a good example of the kind of music photographer who uses editing to effectively capture the music style of the band in their portraits. Each image is dreamy, colourful and stylised. Probably the best example of this is her portrait of Tame Impala at Splendour in the Grass. Taken live, if went unedited it would have been the simple image of a musician on stage with the guitar. However Savannah’s editing incorporates that surreal, psychedelic feeling associated with Tame Impala, making their music apart of the image she took.
Mitch Lowe on the other hand is very good at the classic school of music photography. In contrast to Van Der Niet’s work, Lowe allows the passion of the musician and the crowd to speak for itself, only using minimal editing to highlight the edgy passion that’s already there. A good example being the image he took of the singer in Thy Art is Murder. It’s the high quality and the focus of the shot that really makes you almost feel intimidated. The dark hood pulled over the eyes, the sweat glistening in the hair, the hunched over position, all of it pulled into a tight upwards facing composition, you are literally lorded over by this dramatic character, the lighting making it all the more theatrical. Lowe didn’t need to do anything else other than capture the shot. Which he did very well.

A full list of artists can be found on the Facebook event page here: https://goo.gl/YdzDyv
The combination of unique curation, venue and talent made this exhibition a real testament to Brisbane’s strong and respected live music scene. It’s a visual love letter to all the things that make it really unique.

Artist Profile: Tayla Jay Haggarty
SEPTEMBER 21, 2015
Tayla Jay Haggarty is a Brisbane based artists who uses sculpture and collaboration to explore lesbian-feminist identity. Recently she showed at ORAL_ari with her exhibition WET, but has exhibited all over Brisbane as well as New York. She is currently completing her Honours degree in Fine Arts at QUT.

1. I grew up…
In both Australia and Ireland, avoiding makeup at dance concerts and climbing trees.
2. I am most comfortable…
In the studio making work.
3. I like…
Women.
4. I don’t like…
Coriander.
5. My personality is…
Often described in words such as ‘sociable’ or as a ‘pocket rocket’.
6. I got into art when…
I was very young.
7. My artistic style is…
Largely conceptual, employing various readymade utilitarian objects.
8. The best thing about being an artist is…
The perks. You can purchase two litres of lube and/or industrial strength rope for ‘art reasons’ and simply receive a slow nod of approval.
9. The mediums I use are…
Sculpture, performance and installation.
10. My key influences are…
Lesbian feminist theorists and the ludicrously talented people around me!
11. The artists I admire are…
Rachel Harrison, Sarah Lucas, Elmgreen and Dragset and last but not least Felix Gonzalez Torres.
12. Art is important because…
It explains things we/I otherwise couldn’t.




